by old mare on Fri Sep 28, 2007 9:08 pm
They should look up the Exmoors in England - same savvy soul saved them years back, one of the worlds oldest breeds, and the ponies are not just a huge tourist drawcard to the forest, but control gorse, blackberry, other weeds - not of their doing, and their behavious cuts down the loss of smaller species by deterring foxes and weirdly, poachers etc.
Gees!! When will these people learn.
They can also look up the American sites, BLM (Bureau of Land Management) and off shoots, to see a semi managed wild herd does more good than harm.
How about that Nat Park in WA where they shot all the horses, but the waterways are now jammed with buffalo grass??!! huge fire hazard, lack of habitat...
Oh, and they introduced camels to the high country in the Monaro a couple of years back - to control weeds. Tsk. Yet are still targeting horses, in the hills, having cleared them off the easy areas... Beats me!
Gees.
We are for saving horses, but we are not stupid, sensible country people, we care for the land. As those before us. It is our life.
The land is not a different place to what is was in some respects (few)- if some ferals have been there time out of mind, and is doing no percievable damage ( "weeds" - hey, white man brought weeds, farmers propagate them, even although they try not to... blame the victim.) Victoria? Pristine wilderness?! Australia, pristine?
If any one animal or plant is out of control, meaning, destroying those about it, sure, eliminate or control it. But we have not pristine environments - never - we walked into another people's land. Invaded, took it, and put our weeds and animals there. We have to honour the people, the place, and honour ourselves, all of us together, as now we are one mob; and honour the environment which copes with the past, the interim, the future. If horses are not doing damage, if they're in few numbers, (and they always will be in the wild), if they are controlling introduced weeds - the botanical version of ferals - then take a common sense approach.
Get them off itf it's worry, but gees, after 150 years of stealing land and horses on it, why kill the horses when there's no proven need to>>?? their reasons are not scientifically proven - bring on the science, it might learn them a thing or two.
It is not difficult. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
If they want easy, big, Govt bucks by doing these "studies" (where is the science etc), earn it, by doing it the right way. Take all things into account, and then wisely, make a decision. If horses need to be removed, there are better ways then destruction. Then, when you want your weeds and little animals safe - foxes controlled, write another paper, and discover --- weeds, foxes and cats are not so easy to shoot. As those big things, horses. And those others will become profligate, and thank you,and become a horrific problem.....
Even we can wear common sense... if the horses are so damaging, and need moving, sure, can panic and find a way.., but ain't that the perogative of the owners to do this properly- The Queen and the Govt? to re-locate the horses? Find them homes? On, oh, farmers land - oh gee, wasn't that pristine once? Wasn't Melbourne also???!!! The Govt solution is the final one, of all stupid Govt's - kill em quick.
Personally, not holding my breath for common sense from any Govt Dept. Maybe I am wrong. I hope so....
why not